'Movie: The Party’s Over\r'

'Political companionship is a way where commonwealth of the equivalent reside or brains be get together together to expressed their ideas.  Conflicts between creation in terms of their views and surveys about trusdeucerthy topics and issues be normal.  Thus, it is where they balance each opinion and come up with the decision e rightfullyone hold upon after the discussion. However, this may sometimes non work perfectly enough for the semi habitual and is signaled through the formation of the third parties resembling in unify States.  This means that the two major(ip) parties commence become insensitive to the needs of the public (Wahler 1996).\r\nToday, the two major political parties of the coupled States atomic number 18 parliamentary troupe which evolved in 1782 from Thomas Jefferson party, and republican troupe established in 1850s by Abraham Lincoln and others who opposed the expansion of bondage (Consulate General of the fall in States).\r\nThe re are already a number of youngster or third parties in United States that have evolved through time.  Green Party, nature Party, Independence Party, New Party, Reform Party and Labor Party are unspoilt to name some (Gunzburger 2007).\r\nThe movie The Party’s Over is a accusative about the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election which follows the faker Philip Seymour Hoffman as he took an inside spirit at the 2000 antiauthoritarian and Republican multitude for Al Gore and George Bush.\r\nThe movie draws help for the problems of our g everyplacening body outline especially during the 2000 United States resource. Hoffman gathered views and personal opinions from a very wide range of mess in society.  His interviewees are ranged from musicians the likes of Ben Harper, to Bill Maher a political comedian, to Democrat representatives like Harol cut across jr., to rally organizers, to a homeless cleaning woman (Lebowski 2007).\r\nBill Maher said that American politic al science activity is run by â€Å"a system of open bribery” and the public’s voices are not heard by the government which led to a more a great deal than not apathetic voting public.  Tim Robbins expanded the idea by saying that it is not chaste apathy which stops many people from voting, the people are protesting against the government that’s why they do not pick out (Lebowski 2007).\r\nDemocrat representative Harold Ford Jr. said that the fact is that our government is a service.  And no matter how frequently pitiful the service is, you have no prime(a) but to â€Å"avail” it.  It’s like you have to pay taxes even if the government is too bad for you, or else you testament be jailed and tried (Lebowski 2007).\r\nOn the other hand, Noam Chomsky explained that the theory is that people’s role in democracy is not just as participants but as spectators as well. She further said that during the election period, we are given tw o candidates to acquire from, a democrat and a republican, who are actually and essentially one in the same.  Both of these parties’ candidates have the same goals and indispensability the same outcomes for the government.\r\nBut then they incline to disagree with each other violently and publicly. As a result, it doesn’t really matter to us which of the parties we elect.  And we are stuck in choosing from Democracy and Republican parties that we barely work out at the third parties and independent candidates.  We are centre on our differences instead of our similarities (Lebowski 2007).\r\n underage parties or what we call third parties often call attention to an issue that is of interest to the voters but that has been neglected by government like consumerism and environment as what Ralph Nader focused (Consulate General of the United States).\r\nThe movie leaves the audience a fair question of whether the Democratic and Republican parties are differen t or not.  Also, it wonders on how much one’s priority is put and should put over the politics. It also seeks to get and feel the public pulse about the American politics.  And since it seeks to seize out the larger audience, it promotes the awareness of people on politics and made them have a discussion about it among themselves (Curry 2003).\r\n whole kit Cited\r\nCurry, Warren. â€Å"The Party’s Over.” 21 October 2003. CinemaSpeak.Com. 3 November 2007 <http://www.cinemaspeak.com/Reviews/tpo.html>.\r\nGunzburger, Ron. â€Å"Directory of U.S. Political Parties.” 2007. Politics1.com. 11 November 2007 < http://politics1.com/parties.htm>.\r\nLebowski, Jeff. â€Å"You have to importune youre right even if you know youre wrong.” 4 October 2007.  Spout LLC. 11 November 2007.\r\nâ€Å"U.S. Government.” Consulate General of the United States. 3 November 2007\r\n< http://krakow.usconsulate.gov/parties.html>.\r\nWahler, Br enda. â€Å"Poli Sci 101: The Role of Parties.” January 1996. tonne State University.  11 November 2007 < http://home.mcn.net/~montanabw/polisci101.html>.\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n'