Sunday, February 10, 2019

Responsibility for Eva Smiths Death :: An Inspector Calls J.B. Priestly Essays

Responsibility for Eva Smiths DeathAn examiner C whollys by J.B Priestly, a process, which was first, performedin 1945. The play was set in 1912 before World War I. The playcentres nigh the wealthy Birling family. A visit from a mysteriousInspector Goole becomes a horrifying experience for the Birlings, asthey learn that they have all played a part in the suicide of a four-year-oldgirl called Eva Smith. She died by swallowing some strong disinfectedin an infirmary. Priestleys master(prenominal) aim was to encourage populate to takeresponsibility for their actions, not to miscue the blame on to others.Although each member of the Birling family and Gerald Croft have had allude with Eva Smith, n unmatched of them were aware of the othersinvolvement in the tragedy until the day of the examiners visit. Hemakes each of them aware of the part they had played that occupy to hertragic end. The characters each reacted differently to the news andthe degree of responsibility bring to the death varied betweenthem. They all through their selfishness had shown to contribute toEva Smiths finality to kill herself.We must remember it wasnt a crime. No one should be held responsible.Its a moral issue. It was not only people that contributed to EvaSmiths death but her perplex in the creative activity and the way in which herlife worked out.Mr Birling, a wealthy capitalist man, and a rather portentious man,was the first person to be investigated. Mr.Birling didnt care about whatever of his workers, and didnt know them at all, as he says proudly,I have a twain of hundred workers under me, who keep changing. Thisclearly showed that there was no individual(prenominal) or business relationshipwith Eva Smith.Mr. Birling told the Inspector that all the workers had practiced returnedfrom holiday and had become precise restless. They demanded for a payrise or would go on strike. She was making trouble as Mr Birling said,She had a lot to say, far too much so she had to go. Pe rsonally, Ifathert believe that Mr Birling did anything wrong towards Eva Smith. Heonly had sacked her from his factory because she had started to causetrouble by demanding higher wages. Anyone in his position would havedone the same.Though Mr Birling whitethorn sound impartial there is much to judge of hischaracter. He seems to be a very hard man, and shows no regret fordismissing Eva Smith, despite knowing, that if he had sacked her shemay still have been alive. The effect of dismissing Eva Smith from her

No comments:

Post a Comment